Home  ›  what is a healthy waist to hip ratio

what is a healthy waist to hip ratio

Written By Tuesday, April 5, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Dimensionless ratio of circumference

The waist–hip ratio or waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) is the dimensionless ratio of the circumference of the waist to that of the hips. This is calculated every bit waist measurement divided by hip measurement ( Westward⁄H ). For example, a person with a 30″ (76 cm) waist and 38″ (97 cm) hips has a waist–hip ratio of virtually 0.78.

The WHR has been used as an indicator or measure of health, fertility, and the run a risk of developing serious health weather condition. WHR correlates with perceptions of physical attractiveness.

Measurement [edit]

WHO protocol [edit]

According to the Earth Wellness System'due south data gathering protocol,[two] the waist circumference should be measured at the midpoint between the lower margin of the concluding palpable ribs and the acme of the iliac crest, using a stretch‐resistant tape that provides abiding 100 g tension. Hip circumference should exist measured around the widest portion of the buttocks, with the tape parallel to the floor.[iii] Other organizations use slightly different standards. The Us National Institutes of Health and the National Health and Nutrition Exam Survey used results obtained past measuring at the top of the iliac crest. Waist measurements are commonly obtained by laypersons by measurings around the waist at the navel, but research has shown that these measurements may underestimate the truthful waist circumference.[3]

For both measurements, the private should stand up with feet shut together, arms at the side and body weight evenly distributed, and should wear lilliputian article of clothing. The subject should be relaxed, and the measurements should be taken at the end of a normal respiration. Each measurement should be repeated twice; if the measurements are within 1 cm of i another, the average should be calculated. If the difference between the two measurements exceeds 1 cm, the two measurements should exist repeated.[3]

Practical measurement [edit]

Practically, however, the waist is more conveniently measured merely at the smallest circumference of the natural waist, commonly just above the omphalus, and the hip circumference may likewise exist measured at its widest office of the buttocks or hip.[4] Also, in case the waist is convex rather than concave, such as with different torso types, and obesity, the waist may be measured at a horizontal level ane" (2.v cm) higher up the navel.[v]

Indicator of health [edit]

The WHR has been used every bit an indicator or measure out of wellness, and as a run a risk cistron for developing serious health conditions.

WHR is used every bit a measurement of obesity, which in turn is a possible indicator of other more than serious health conditions. The WHO states that abdominal obesity is defined as a waist–hip ratio above 0.90 for males and above 0.85 for females, or a body mass alphabetize (BMI) higher up xxx.0.[3] The National Found of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) states that "total cholesterol levels are ordinarily higher in persons with predominant abdominal obesity, defined every bit a waist-to-hip circumference ratio of ≥ 0.eight for women and ≥ i.0 for men.[half dozen]

DGSP[7] WHO[three] NIDDK[8]
Women Men Women Men Women Men
under-weight ? ? ? ? ? ?
normal weight < 0.eighty < 0.90 ? ? ? ?
over-weight 0.80–0.84 0.90–0.99 ? ? ? ?
obese > 0.85 > 1.00 > 0.85 > 0.90 > 0.fourscore > 1.00

WHR has been found to be a more than efficient predictor of mortality in older people (>75 years of age) than waist circumference or BMI.[9] If obesity is redefined using WHR instead of BMI, the proportion of people categorized equally at risk of heart attack worldwide increases threefold.[ten] WHR may be less accurate in individuals with a BMI of 35 or higher, and more complex to translate since an increased WHR may outcome from increased abdominal fat or decreased lean muscle mass effectually the hips.[11] The body fat percentage is considered to be an even more accurate measure of relative weight. Of these 3 measurements, just the waist–hip ratio takes account of the differences in torso structure. Hence, it is possible for two women to take vastly different body mass indices but the aforementioned waist–hip ratio, or to accept the same body mass alphabetize merely vastly dissimilar waist–hip ratios.

WHR has been shown to exist a better predictor of cardiovascular disease than waist circumference and trunk-mass alphabetize.[12] However, other studies have constitute waist circumference, not WHR, to be a adept indicator of cardiovascular risk factors,[13] body fat distribution,[14] and hypertension in type two diabetes.[15]

Stress [edit]

The stress hormone cortisol is regulated by the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) centrality and has been associated with higher levels of intestinal fat and therefore a higher WHR.[xvi] Abdominal fat is a mark of visceral fat (stored around of import internal organs such as the liver, pancreas and intestines) and has greater blood menstruum and more receptors for cortisol than peripheral fat. The greater the number of cortisol receptors, the more than sensitive the visceral fat tissue is to cortisol. This heightened sensitivity to cortisol stimulates fatty cells to further increment in size.[17] Women who have a combination of normal BMI and high WHR feel elevated cortisol reactivity to astute stressors and failure to habituate to repeated stressors, compared to women with normal WHR.[eighteen] This suggests that high WHR might as well indicate HPA-axis dysregulation and over-exposure to cortisol.

Evidence for the human relationship between cortisol and primal fat distribution has primarily been studied in individuals with Cushing's syndrome.[19] This is characterized by over-exposure to cortisol due to elevated action of the HPA axis. A main component of Cushing's syndrome is the accumulation of fat in the abdominal region, and it is hypothesized that elevated cortisol levels contribute to this aggregating. Withal, this hypothesis remains contested every bit cortisol levels merely modestly explain variation in central fat distribution. It is more likely that a complex set up of biological and neuroendocrine pathways related to cortisol secretion contribute to central adiposity, such as leptin, neuropeptide y, corticotropin releasing factor and the sympathetic nervous system.[nineteen]

Growth and development [edit]

In full general, adults with growth hormone deficiencies also have increased WHRs.[xx] [21] Adults with untreated congenital isolated growth hormone deficiency take increased WHRs, possibly from increased cortisone:cortisol ratios and insulin sensitivities.[21] Since these individuals have increased visceral obesity, it has been suggested that a minimal growth hormone secretion would theoretically increase insulin resistance.[21] Yet, considering of the growth hormone deficiency, this insulin resistance point cannot be reached and these individuals are more sensitive to insulin. Increased adipose deposits are therefore more likely to class in these individuals, causing the high WHR. Growth hormone deficiencies have also been correlated with WHRs in prepubertal children; the specific baseline body statistics, such every bit WHRs, of pre-pubertal children with growth hormone deficiencies can predict growth response effectiveness to bogus growth hormone therapies, such as rhGH treatments.[22]

Sex activity characteristics [edit]

Males with congenital adrenal hyperplasia, determined by CYP21A2 mutations, have increased WHRs.[23]

Fertility [edit]

Women with high WHR (0.eighty or higher) take significantly lower pregnancy rates than women with lower WHRs (0.70–0.79), independent of their BMIs.[24] Men with WHRs around 0.9, similarly, have been shown to be more salubrious and fertile with less prostate cancer and testicular cancer.[25]

Show suggests that WHR is an accurate somatic indicator of reproductive endocrinological status and long-term health take chances. Among girls with identical body weights, those with lower WHRs bear witness earlier pubertal endocrine activity, as measured by loftier levels of lutenizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone, equally well as sex steroid (estradiol) activity. A Dutch prospective study on issue in an bogus insemination plan provides evidence for the role of WHR and fecundity.[26] These investigators report that a 0.one unit of measurement increase in WHR decreases the probability of conception per cycle by 30% after aligning for age, obesity, reasons for artificial insemination, bicycle length and regularity, smoking, and parity.[27] [28]

Menopause, the natural or surgical abeyance of the menstrual cycle, is due to an overall decrease in ovarian production of the hormones estradiol and progesterone. These hormonal changes are also associated with an increase in WHR independent of increases in body mass.[29] Significantly, studies find that large premenopausal WHRs are associated with lower estradiol levels and variation in age of menopause onset.[30] Circulating estrogen preferentially stores lipid deposits in the gluteofemoral region, including the buttocks and thighs, and testify suggests that menopause-associated estrogen deficiency results in an aggregating of adipose deposits around the abdomen.[31] These menopause-induced changes in body fat distribution can be counteracted with hormone replacement therapy.[32] In contrast, aging males gradually accumulate intestinal fat, and hence increased WHR, in parallel with declining androgen levels.[nineteen]

Cognitive ability [edit]

Using information from the U.S. National Heart for Health Statistics, William Lassek at the University of Pittsburgh in Pennsylvania and Steven Gaulin of the University of California, Santa Barbara, plant a child's functioning in cerebral tests correlated to their female parent's waist–hip ratio, a proxy for how much fatty she stores on her hips.[33]

Children whose mothers had wide hips and a low waist–hip ratio scored highest, leading Lassek and Gaulin to suggest that fetuses benefit from hip fatty, which contains long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, critical for the evolution of the fetus's encephalon.[33] In addition, evidence suggests that children of depression-WHR teens were protected from the cognitive deficits oft associated with teen birth.

Human being genetics [edit]

Studies in twins have suggested that between 22% and 61% of variability in waist-to-hip ratio may be deemed for past genetic factors.[34]

Every bit an indicator of attractiveness [edit]

Male attractiveness [edit]

Research has found waist-to-breast ratio to exist the largest determinant of male attractiveness, with body mass alphabetize and waist-to-hip ratio not as significant.[35]

Female attractiveness [edit]

The concept and significance of WHR as an indicator of attractiveness was first theorized past evolutionary psychologist Devendra Singh at the University of Texas at Austin in 1993.[36] [37] Singh argued that the WHR was a more consistent estrogen mark than the bosom–waist ratio (BWR) studied at King's College, London by Glenn Wilson in the 1970s.[38] [39]

Some researchers take found that the waist–hip ratio is a significant measure of female attractiveness.[40] Women with a 0.7 WHR are ordinarily rated every bit more attractive by men from Indo-European cultures.[41] Preferences may vary, according to some studies,[42] ranging from 0.half-dozen in Red china, South America, and some of Africa[43] to 0.8 in Cameroon and amongst the Hadza tribe of Tanzania,[25] [44] [45] with divergent preferences according to the ethnicity of the observed being noted.[46] [47]

Information technology appears that men in westernized societies are more influenced past female waist size than hip size: "Hip size indicates pelvic size and the amount of additional fatty storage that can exist used as a source of free energy. Waist size conveys information such as current reproductive status or health status ... in westernized societies with no risk of seasonal lack of food, the waist, conveying data about fecundity and health status, will exist more of import than hip size for assessing a female's attractiveness".[48]

Past western standards, women in foraging populations have loftier numbers of pregnancies, loftier parasite loads, and loftier caloric dependence on fibrous foods. These variables modify beyond cultures, suggesting that

  1. the normal range of female WHR was often higher than in western cultures,
  2. what constituted locally "WHR" varied, and
  3. average WHR of nubile females and of females of summit fertility varied.

Thus, a WHR that indicates pubertal onset, sex, fertility, hormonal irregularities, and/or differentiates male from female in one population may non exercise so in some other.[49]

In a serial of 1993 studies washed by Singh, men used WHR and overall body fat to decide a woman's attractiveness. In his commencement report, men were shown a series of 12 drawings of women with various WHRs and body fat. Drawings with normal weight and a low WHR were associated with the about positive traits (i.e. attractive, sexy, intelligent and healthy). The drawings of thin female figures were non associated with any positive traits except youthfulness.[50]

Through this study, Singh suggests that males and females may have developed innate mechanisms which detect and brand use of the WHR to appraise how healthy an private is and (particularly for men), infer possible mate value. Having a good for you mate improves the chances of producing offspring with inherited genetic protection from various diseases and a healthy mate is more likely to be a good parent (Hamilton & Zuk, 1982; Thornhill, 1993).[51]

Other studies discovered WHR every bit a bespeak of attractiveness as well, beyond just examining body fat and fertility. Barnaby Dixson, Gina Grimshaw, Wayne Linklater, and Alan Dixson conducted a written report using centre-tracking techniques to evaluate men's fixation on digitally contradistinct photographs of the aforementioned woman, as well every bit asking the men to evaluate the images based on attractiveness. What they found was while men fixated on the woman's breasts in each photograph, they selected the images where the woman had a 0.7 WHR as most attractive, regardless of breast size.[52] Pazhoohi et al. (2019) using center tracking confirmed that lower than optimal WHRs when posing in contrapposto, which causes i side of the body to have a lower than optimal view-dependent WHR, are perceived more attractive and are supernormal stimuli.[53]

Furthermore, referencing a 2005 written report conducted by Johnson and Tassinary looking at blithe human walking stimuli, Farid Pazhoohi and James R. Liddle proposed that men practise not solely use WHR to evaluate attractiveness, but also a means of sex-differentiation, with college WHR perceived as more masculine and lower WHR every bit an indicator of femininity. Pazhoohi and Liddle used this idea equally a possible additional explanation every bit to why men perceive a lower WHR as more than attractive – because it relates to an expression of femininity, as opposed to masculinity and a college WHR.[54] On this basis, information technology was shown that men with lower, more than feminine, WHRs feel less comfy and self-study lower body esteem and self-efficacy than men with higher, more masculine, WHRs.[55]

To raise their perceived bewitchery, some women may artificially alter their credible WHR. The methods include the use of a corset to reduce the waist size and hip and buttock padding to increase the apparent size of the hips and buttocks. In an earlier try to quantify attractiveness, corset and girdle manufacturers of the 20th century used a calculation chosen hip spring [56] (or hip-jump or hipspring), calculated by subtracting the waist measurement from the hip measurement. However this calculation brutal into disuse considering it is a poor indicator of attractiveness; for example, a hip jump of ten inches (250 mm) would likely be considered quite attractive for an average-sized developed adult female, just a child or petite woman with the same number would more likely be seen as malnourished.

WHR versus BMI attractiveness is related to fertility, not fat content. A study performed by Holliday used calculator generated female body shapes to construct images which covary with real female trunk mass (indexed with BMI) and not with body shape (indexed with WHR), and vice versa. Twelve observers (6 male and vi female) rated these images for attractiveness during an fMRI written report. The attractiveness ratings were correlated with changes in BMI and non WHR. The results demonstrated that in addition to activation in higher visual areas, changes to BMI had a direct impact on activity within the brain's reward arrangement. This shows that BMI, not WHR, modulates advantage mechanisms in the encephalon and that this may have important implications for judgements of ideal body size in eating-matted individuals.[57]

Another report, conducted by Adrian Furnham, was used as an extension of Singh and Young'southward 1995 investigation. A full of 137 participants were in the study. In that location were 98 female participants. The age range was between xvi and 67. The majority of participants were undergraduates, and 90% were white British, the residuum being Asian (Eastward Indian) and African. Their educational and socio-economical backgrounds (nearly all middle class) were fairly homogenous, and none had previously participated in any studies involving female person body shape or attractiveness. It was predicted that the effect of chest size on judgment of bewitchery and age estimation would be dependent on overall trunk fatty and the size of the waist-to-hip ratio.[58]

All the participants were given a booklet with viii pictures in total. Each figure was identified as heavy or slender, feminine WHR or masculine WHR, and large-breasted or small-breasted. The participants rated the figures for four personal attributes (bewitchery, healthiness, femininity, and kindness/understanding).[58]

When ratings of the figures' attractiveness were made, mostly it appeared that bust size, WHR, and their weight were all important contributory elements. The female participants rated the figures with a low WHR as more attractive, healthy, feminine-looking, and in the case of the heavy effigy, more kind and agreement than did male participants. This is a particularly interesting finding, as about previous studies report that young women idealize female bodies solely on the basis of thinness. Equally far as the breast sizes of the slender figures is concerned, whether they had large or small breasts did not appear to have whatsoever effect on the ratings of attractiveness or kindness or understanding, and having larger breasts only increased the hateful ratings of wellness and femininity very slightly. However, a heavy effigy with a high WHR and a large bosom was rated as the least bonny and good for you by all participants.[58]

Waist–hip ratio is besides a reliable cue to 1'due south sex activity and it is hypothesised that the "individuals who represent a mismatch based on the cue provided by WHR (e.g., women with high WHR values or men with depression WHR values) would probable be viewed equally unattractive by the opposite sex."[59]

A 2017 University of Wroclaw study of effectually one chiliad women across different cultures—designed to address the conflicting theories—concluded that an attractive WHR is not a predictor of acme fertility, but actually a predictor of the onset of fertility and therefore a predictor of maximal long term reproductive potential and minimal chance of raising a competing male's children.[threescore] The study authors concluded "Hence, information technology can be predicted that the preference for a depression WHR results from male preference for women at acme residual reproductive value, just prior to first probably fertile ovulatory cycle (and with no previous children).[lx]

Food [edit]

Venus of Willendorf. The earliest known representations of female figures date from 23,000 to 25,000 years agone.[61] and had bodies with vestigial head and limbs, noted for their very loftier waist:hip ratio of 1:1 or more than.[61] Information technology may be that the artists' "depictions of corpulent, middle-anile females were not 'Venuses' in any conventional sense. They may, instead, accept symbolized the hope for survival and longevity, within well-nourished and reproductively successful communities."[61]

A number of studies have been carried out with focus on food composition of diets in relation to changes in waist circumference adjusted for body mass index.

Whole-grain, ready-to-eat, oat cereal diets reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and waist circumference in overweight or obese adults more than low-fibre control food diets. Weight loss did not vary between groups.[62]

In an American sample of 459 healthy men and women participating in the ongoing 'Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging', the mean annual increment [with age] in waist circumference was more than 3 times equally cracking for the participants in the white-bread cluster compared with the participants using a diet that is high in fruit, vegetables, reduced-fat dairy and whole grains and is low in red or candy meat, fast food and soft drink.[63]

A 2011 study suggests that dietary pattern high in fruit and dairy and low in white staff of life, processed meat, margarine, and soft drinks may assistance to foreclose abdominal fat accumulation.[64]

See also [edit]

  • Artistic canons of body proportions – Criteria used in formal figurative art
  • Body proportions – Proportions of the human body in art
  • Digit ratio – Ratio of lengths of fingers
  • Leg-to-torso ratio – Numerical alphabetize of body proportion
  • Physical attractiveness – Aesthetic cess of concrete traits
  • Sexual attraction – Allure on the basis of sexual want
  • Bust/waist/hip measurements – Measures used for fitting clothing
  • Wasp waist – Women's fashion silhouette
  • Waist-to-height ratio – Numerical alphabetize of body proportion

References [edit]

  1. ^ Bovet, Jeanne; Raymond, Michel (17 April 2015). "Preferred Women's Waist-to-Hip Ratio Variation over the Terminal two,500 Years". PLOS ONE. doi:ten.1371/journal.pone.0123284. PMID 25886537. cited in Stephen Heyman (May 27, 2015). "Gleaning New Perspectives by Measuring Body Proportions in Art". The New York Times . Retrieved 10 September 2020.
  2. ^ "STEPwise approach to surveillance (STEPS)". World Health System. Retrieved March 21, 2012.
  3. ^ a b c d e "Waist Circumference and Waist–Hip Ratio, Report of a WHO Expert Consultation" (PDF). World Health Organization. 8–11 Dec 2008. Retrieved March 21, 2012.
  4. ^ In some places it is accepted that a woman's waist is measured 1 inch (2.5cm) in a higher place her omphalos and that a human is measured one inch below his bellybutton. Waist To Hip Calculator at University of Maryland Medical System. Retrieved December 2010
  5. ^ Brown JE, Potter JD, Jacobs DR, Kopher RA, Rourke MJ, Barosso GM, Hannan PJ, Schmid LA (1996). "Maternal Waist-to-Hip Ratio as a Predictor of Newborn Size: Results of the Diana Projection". Epidemiology. 7 (i): 62–6. doi:ten.1097/00001648-199601000-00011. JSTOR 3702758. PMID 8664403. S2CID 24471765.
  6. ^ "Chapter 2 – Overweight and obesity: Groundwork". Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. NIH Publication No. 98-4083. September 1998. p. fourteen. {{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  7. ^ South ane- Leitlinie Vorsorgeuntersuchung im Sport. 2007 Dt. Gesellschaft für Sportmedizin und Prävention e.V. (DGSP)
  8. ^ "Waist to Hip Ratio". freedieting.com.
  9. ^ Toll GM, Uauy R, Breeze Eastward, Bulpitt CJ, Fletcher AE (August 2006). "Weight, shape, and bloodshed risk in older persons: elevated waist–hip ratio, not loftier body mass index, is associated with a greater risk of death". Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 84 (2): 449–60. doi:10.1093/ajcn/84.1.449. PMID 16895897. Lay summary.
  10. ^ Yusuf S, Hawken South, Ounpuu S, Bautista 50, Franzosi MG, Commerford P, Lang CC, Rumboldt Z, Onen CL, Lisheng L, Tanomsup Southward, Wangai P, Razak F, Sharma AM, Anand SS (November 2005). "Obesity and the risk of myocardial infarction in 27,000 participants from 52 countries: a case-control report". Lancet. 366 (9497): 1640–9. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67663-5. PMID 16271645. S2CID 37977130.
  11. ^ "Measuring Obesity". Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. 21 October 2012. Retrieved viii July 2021. [Waist-to-Hip Ratio:] * More complex to interpret than waist circumference, since increased waist-to-hip ratio tin be acquired by increased intestinal fat or decrease in lean musculus mass around the hips. * May be difficult to measure and less accurate in individuals with a BMI of 35 or higher.
  12. ^ Mørkedal B, Romundstad PR, Vatten LJ (2011). "Informativeness of indices of blood pressure, obesity and serum lipids in relation to ischaemic middle disease mortality: the Hunt-Ii study". European Journal of Epidemiology. 26 (half-dozen): 457–461. doi:x.1007/s10654-011-9572-7. ISSN 0393-2990. PMC3115050. PMID 21461943.
  13. ^ Dobbelsteyn CJ, Joffres MR, MacLean DR, Flowerdew 1000 (May 2001). "A comparative evaluation of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index as indicators of cardiovascular gamble factors. The Canadian Heart Wellness Surveys". Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 25 (5): 652–61. doi:ten.1038/sj.ijo.0801582. PMID 11360147.
  14. ^ Ketel IJ, Volman MN, Seidell JC, Stehouwer CD, Twisk JW, Lambalk CB (June 2007). "Superiority of skinfold measurements and waist over waist-to-hip ratio for determination of body fat distribution in a population-based cohort of Caucasian Dutch adults". Eur. J. Endocrinol. 156 (6): 655–61. doi:10.1530/EJE-06-0730. PMID 17535865.
  15. ^ Picon PX, Leitão CB, Gerchman F, Azevedo MJ, Silveiro SP, Gross JL, Canani LH (April 2007). "[Waist measure and waist-to-hip ratio and identification of clinical conditions of cardiovascular risk: multicentric study in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients]". Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol (in Portuguese). 51 (three): 443–9. doi:10.1590/S0004-27302007000300013. PMID 17546244.
  16. ^ Wardle, J; Chida, Y; Gibson, EL; Whitaker, KL; Steptoe, A (2011). "Stress and adiposity: a meta-assay of longitudinal studies". Obesity. 19 (4): 771–778. doi:10.1038/oby.2010.241. PMID 20948519. S2CID 22109260.
  17. ^ Pedersen, SB; Jonler, 1000; Richelsen, B (1994). "Label of regional and gender differences in glucocorticoid receptors and lipoprotein lipase activity in human being adipose tissue". Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 78 (ane): 1354–1359. doi:10.1210/jcem.78.vi.8200937. PMID 8200937.
  18. ^ Epel, ES; McEwen, B; Seeman, T; Matthews, Thousand; Castellazzo, G; Brownell, KD (2007). "Stress and body shape: stress-induced cortisol secretion is consistently greater among women with key fat". Psychosomatic Medicine. 62 (five): 623–632. CiteSeerXx.one.1.469.7416. doi:x.1097/00006842-200009000-00005. PMID 11020091. S2CID 4846466.
  19. ^ a b c Samaras, Chiliad; Campbell, LV (1997). "The non-genetic determinants of central adiposity". International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders. 21 (x): 839–845. doi:x.1038/sj.ijo.0800502. PMID 9347401.
  20. ^ Murray, R (2010). "Fractional growth hormone deficiency is associated with an adverse cardiovascular risk contour and increased carotid intima-medial thickness". Clinical Endocrinology (Oxford). 73 (four): 508–515. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03754.10. PMID 20039899. S2CID 205285764.
  21. ^ a b c Gomes-Santos, East (2014). "Increased visceral adiposity and cortisol to cortisone ratio in adults with congenital isolated GH deficiency". Journal of Clinical Endocrinology. 99 (ix): 3285–3289. doi:10.1210/jc.2014-2132. PMID 24926956.
  22. ^ Esen, I (2013). "The association between growth response to growth hormone and baseline body composition of children with growth hormone deficiency". Growth Hormone and IGF Research. 23 (5): 196–199. doi:10.1016/j.ghir.2013.07.001. PMID 23890535.
  23. ^ Falhammer, H (2011). "Cardiovascular risk, metabolic contour, and body composition in developed males with congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency". European Journal of Endocrinology. 164 (2): 285–293. doi:10.1530/EJE-10-0877. PMID 21098686.
  24. ^ Singh D (December 2002). "Female mate value at a glance: relationship of waist-to-hip ratio to health, fecundity and attractiveness" (PDF). Neuro Endocrinol. Lett. 23. Suppl four: 81–91. PMID 12496738.
  25. ^ a b Marlowe, F.; Apicella, C.; Reed, D. (2005). "Men'south preferences for women's profile waist-to-hip ratio in two societies" (PDF). Development and Human Behavior. 26 (6): 458–68. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.07.005.
  26. ^ Zaadstra BM, Seidell JC, Van Noord PA, te Velde ER, Habbema JD, Vrieswijk B, Karbaat J (1993). "Fat and female fecundity: prospective written report of upshot of body fat distribution on conception rates". BMJ. 306 (6876): 484–487. doi:10.1136/bmj.306.6876.484. PMC1676805. PMID 8448457.
  27. ^ Singh (1993a). "Adaptive significance of female person concrete attractiveness: Role of the waist-to-hip ratio". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 65 (2): 293–307. CiteSeerX10.1.1.492.9539. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.293. PMID 8366421.
  28. ^ Singh (1993b). "Body shape and women's attractiveness. The critical part of waist-to-hip ratio". Homo Nature. 4 (3): 297–321. doi:ten.1007/bf02692203. PMID 24214368. S2CID 26659163.
  29. ^ Cagnacci, A; Zanin, R; Cannoletta, G; Generali, M; Caretto, Due south; Volpe, A (2007). "Menopause, estrogens, progestins, or their combination on torso weight and anthropometric mensurate". Fertility and Sterility. 88 (six): 1603–1608. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.039. PMID 17481628.
  30. ^ Freeman, EW; Sammel, Physician; Lin, H; Gracia, CR (2007). "Obesity and reproductive hormone levels in the transition to menopause". Menopause. 17 (iv): 718–726. doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e3181cec85d. PMC2888623. PMID 20216473.
  31. ^ Cagnacci et al., 2007
  32. ^ Genazzani, AR; Gambacciani, M (2006). "Effect of climacteric transition and hormone replacement therapy on torso weight and trunk fat distribution". Gynecological Endocrinology. 22 (3): 145–150. doi:ten.1080/09513590600629092. PMID 16835076. S2CID 32187013.
  33. ^ a b Lassek, W.; Gaulin Southward. (Jan 2008). "Waist–hip ratio and cognitive ability: is gluteofemoral fat a privileged store of neurodevelopmental resources?". Evolution and Man Behavior. 29 (1): 26–34. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.07.005.
  34. ^ "'Pear shaped' genes found – NHS Choices – Health News". www.nhs.uk.
  35. ^ Fan J, Dai Due west, Liu F, Wu J (February 2005). "Visual perception of male person body attractiveness". Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 272 (1560): 219–26. doi:ten.1098/rspb.2004.2922. PMC1634963. PMID 15705545.
  36. ^ Singh, Devendra (August 1993). "Adaptive significance of female concrete attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 65 (2): 293–307. CiteSeerX10.one.1.492.9539. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.293. PMID 8366421.
  37. ^ Buss, David G. The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating (hardcover) (2nd ed.). New York: Bones Books. p. 56.
  38. ^ Wilson, Glenn D.; Brazendale, Anthony H. (1974). "Psychological correlates of sexual attractiveness: An empirical demonstration of denial and fantasy gratification phenomena?". Social Beliefs and Personality. two: thirty–4. doi:ten.2224/sbp.1974.2.1.thirty.
  39. ^ Wilson, Glenn D.; Nias, David; Brazendale, Anthony (1975). "Vital Statistics, Perceived Sexual Attractiveness, and Response to Risque Sense of humor". Journal of Social Psychology. 95 (2): 201–v. doi:x.1080/00224545.1975.9918705.
  40. ^ "Perfect waist-to-hip ratio is 0.vii". Times of India. {{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  41. ^ Singh, Devendra; Young, Robert Chiliad. (27 June 2001). "Torso Weight, Waist-to-Hip Ratio, Breasts, and Hips: Role in Judgments of Female Attractiveness and Desirability for Relationships" (PDF). Ethology and Sociobiology. 16 (half-dozen): 483–507. doi:x.1016/0162-3095(95)00074-7.
  42. ^ Fisher, M. L.; Voracek, 1000. (June 2006). "The shape of beauty: Determinants of female physical attractiveness". Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 5 (ii): 190–194. doi:10.1111/j.1473-2165.2006.00249.x. PMID 17173598. S2CID 25660426.
  43. ^ Dixson, Barnaby J.; Dixson, Alan F.; Li, B; Anderson, M. J. (January 2007). "Studies of human being physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in China". American Journal of Human Biological science. 19 (one): 88–95. doi:x.1002/ajhb.20584. PMID 17160976. S2CID 8868828.
  44. ^ Marlowe, F.; Wetsman, A. (2001). "Preferred waist-to-hip ratio and environmental" (PDF). Personality and Individual Differences. 30 (three): 481–489. CiteSeerX10.i.ane.489.4169. doi:ten.1016/S0191-8869(00)00039-8.
  45. ^ Dixson, Barnaby J.; Dixson, Alan F.; Morgan, B; Anderson, M. J. (June 2007). "Human being physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in Bakossiland, Cameroon". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 36 (3): 369–375. doi:10.1007/s10508-006-9093-8. PMID 17136587. S2CID 40115821.
  46. ^ Freedman, R. E.; Carter, M. One thousand.; Sbrocco, T.; Gray, J. J. (August 2007). "Practise men agree African-American and Caucasian women to different standards of beauty?". Eating Behaviors. viii (three): 319–333. doi:x.1016/j.eatbeh.2006.11.008. PMC3033406. PMID 17606230.
  47. ^ Freedman, R. E.; Carter, K. M.; Sbrocco, T.; Gray, J. J. (July 2004). "Ethnic differences in preferences for female weight and waist-to-hip ratio: A comparing of African-American and White American higher and community samples". Eating Behaviors. 5 (three): 191–198. doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2004.01.002. PMID 15135331.
  48. ^ Rozmus-Wrzesinska, M.; Pawlowski, B. (March 2005). "Men'south ratings of female attractiveness are influenced more than past changes in female waist size compared with changes in hip size". Biological Psychology. 68 (3): 299–308. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.04.007. PMID 15620796. S2CID 46635553.
  49. ^ Kiss, David Grand. (2005). The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN9780471727224.
  50. ^ Singh, Devendra (1 January 1994). "Is thin really beautiful and adept? Relationship betwixt waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and female person attractiveness". Personality and Private Differences. 16 (one): 123–132. doi:x.1016/0191-8869(94)90116-3.
  51. ^ Singh, Devendra; Immature, Robert Chiliad. (ane November 1995). "Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Function in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships". Ethology and Sociobiology. sixteen (6): 483–507. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(95)00074-vii.
  52. ^ Dixson, Barnaby J.; Grimshaw, Gina M.; Linklater, Wayne L.; Dixson, Alan F. (1 February 2011). "Eye-tracking of men's preferences for waist-to-hip ratio and breast size of women". Athenaeum of Sexual Behavior. forty (1): 43–l. doi:ten.1007/s10508-009-9523-5. ISSN 1573-2800. PMID 19688590. S2CID 4997497.
  53. ^ Pazhoohi, Farid; Macedo, M. F.; Doyle, J. F.; Arantes, J. (2019). "Waist-to-hip Ratio every bit Supernormal Stimuli: Effect of Contrapposto Pose and Viewing Angle". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 49 (three): 837–847. doi:10.1007/s10508-019-01486-z. PMID 31214904. S2CID 195066235.
  54. ^ Pazhoohi, Farid; Liddle, James R. (2012). "Identifying feminine and masculine ranges for waist-to-hip ratio". Periodical of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology. half dozen (2): 227–232. doi:ten.1037/h0099212.
  55. ^ Pazhoohi, Farid; Hosseinchari, M.; Doyle, J. F. (2012). "Iranian men's waist-to-hip ratios, shoulder-to-hip ratios, body esteem and self-efficacy". Periodical of Evolutionary Psychology. ten (ii): 61–67. doi:x.1556/jep.10.2012.ii.2.
  56. ^ "Bald". Corsetiere.internet.
  57. ^ Holliday, I. E.; Longe, O. A.; Thai, Due north.; Hancock, P. B.; Tovée, Grand. J. (2011). "BMI non WHR modulates BOLD fMRI responses in a sub-cortical reward network when participants judge the bewitchery of human female person bodies". PLoS One. 6 (11): 11. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...627255H. doi:x.1371/periodical.pone.0027255. PMC3216937. PMID 22102883.
  58. ^ a b c Furnham, Adrian; Dias, Melanie; McClelland, Alastair (1998). "The Role of Body Weight, Waist-to-Hip Ratio, and Breast Size in Judgments of Female Attractiveness". Sexual activity Roles. Springer. 39 (3–4): 311–326. doi:10.1023/A:1018810723493. S2CID 148208789.
  59. ^ Pazhoohi, Farid; Liddle, James R. (June 2012). "Identifying feminine and masculine ranges for waist-to-hip ratio". Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology. 6 (2): 227–232. doi:10.1037/h0099212.
  60. ^ a b 1000. Butovskaya, A. Sorokowska, M. Karwowski, A. Sabiniewicz, J. Fedenok, D. Dronova, M. Negasheva, Eastward. Selivanova, and P. Sorokowski (May 9, 2017). "Waist-to-hip ratio, body-mass alphabetize, age and number of children in 7 traditional societies". Scientific Reports. 7 (one): 1622. Bibcode:2017NatSR...7.1622B. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-01916-nine. PMC5431669. PMID 28487573. {{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link) cited in Lents, Nathan H. (June 19, 2017). "The Relationship Between Waist–Hip Ratio and Fertility: Research from traditional societies provides dramatic new bear witness". Psychology Today . Retrieved June 17, 2021.
  61. ^ a b c Alan F. Dixson; Barnaby J. Dixson (2011). "Venus Figurines of the European Paleolithic: Symbols of Fertility or Attractiveness?". Periodical of Anthropology. 2011: 1–11. doi:x.1155/2011/569120.
  62. ^ Maki KC, Beiseigel JM, Jonnalagadda SS, Gugger CK, Reeves MS, Farmer MV, Kaden VN, Rains TM (2010). "Whole-grain ready-to-eat oat cereal, as part of a dietary program for weight loss, reduces depression-density lipoprotein cholesterol in adults with overweight and obesity more than a dietary program including depression-cobweb control foods". Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 110 (2): 205–fourteen. doi:ten.1016/j.jada.2009.10.037. PMID 20102847.
  63. ^ Newby PK, Muller D, Hallfrisch J, Qiao N, Andres R, Tucker KL (2003). "Dietary patterns and changes in trunk mass index and waist circumference in adults". The American Journal of Clinical Diet. 77 (6): 1417–25. doi:10.1093/ajcn/77.half dozen.1417. PMID 12791618.
  64. ^ Romaguera D, Ängquist L, Du H, Jakobsen MU, Forouhi NG, Halkjær J, Feskens EJ, van der A DL, Masala G, Steffen A, Palli D, Wareham NJ, Overvad K, Tjønneland A, Boeing H, Riboli E, Sørensen TI (2011). "Food composition of the nutrition in relation to changes in waist circumference adjusted for body mass index". PLOS One. six (eight): e23384. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...623384R. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023384. PMC3157378. PMID 21858094.

Further reading [edit]

  • Karremans J. C., Frankenhuis W. E., Arons S. (2010). "Bullheaded men adopt a depression waist-to-hip ratio". Evolution and Man Behavior. 31 (three): 182–186. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.x.001. {{cite periodical}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

External links [edit]

  • "Waist–hip ratio should replace body mass index as indicator of mortality gamble in older people" – EurekAlert Baronial 8, 2006
  • "Trunk visualizer". MPI IS Perceiving Systems Section, Max Planck Establish. 2011. Retrieved 23 September 2020.

roachdected.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waist%E2%80%93hip_ratio

0 Response to "what is a healthy waist to hip ratio"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel